Pink Poogle Toy Forum

The official community of Pink Poogle Toy
Main Site
NeoDex
It is currently Wed Apr 08, 2026 7:59 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 2:48 pm 
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Posts: 4587
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 6:33 am
Location: Being PWNED
Gender: Female
Qanda wrote:
Do you really mind people stealing your artwork? If it were me, I would just treat it as a sort of compliment (hey, my artwork is good enough for people to want to steal it! ). Anyway, once you submitted your artwork, it isn't yours anymore, it belongs to Neopets, so technically they are just stealing art from the Neopets site


*blinks*
And this is exactly the attitude that is so dangerous places like neopets, and for the most part, online. And I think neo understands that. Because they do treat art theft as a freezable action.
Art theft is a major problem. I remember when I got into the gallery with my maraquan draik picture that I was bombarded by people freaking out and wanting to be my neofriend because I was such a "1337" artist (I think I spelt that right... anywho).
I was also hit with a whole bunch of requests to use my picture in things, and I said no to every single one. I don't want my art plastering someone elses guild. I don't want my art to be stolen. And yet... people will even if you say no.
I had someone neomail me, ask about it, I said no, they said fine... and when I checked out their guild? Guess whose artwork was gracing their guilds background. Mine.
Guess whose now frozen? Them.
It may be a "compliment" to have your art stolen, but to not be allowed the common dignity to being credited with what you've done (since most people won't), and to not be thanked, or told, or even asked whether your art can be used. It's disgusting, degrading and it should never be allowed.
Neo may get the copy right while the image is on their site; but only then. They still acknowledge that they did not do the artwork, and that it does infact belong to someone else. It's just protected while on their site.


Image
Evisceration is a sign of respect.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:34 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
User avatar

Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 8:11 pm
Well.. No. I don't treat it as a compliment. A compliment would be them taking their own two hands and drawing an image for me, or neomailing me saying "Hey, great job!" or something. Stealing my work is taking the credit and getting the benefit of my 3-4 hours of work per image.

So.. no. not really.

I don't really care if neopets claims owner ship of my images, after I submit them. After-all, the characters, are copyright them, and its fanart to the company, neopets inc. So no, I don't feel that they are mis-useing it, but its the users, that are doing it for their own gain on their own account, that are useing my hard work to get money, that are wrong.

This neomail just really bugged me, that someone would have a black enough of a heart to taught someone, after a job well done.

Sorry if I seem like I'm jumping on ya'all, but I'm a freelance illustrator - I live off of people buying my artwork and giving me credit - So art theft is a huge deal to me.. ;.;


<img border="0" src="http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-3/981991/pptbanner.jpg " width="400" height="80">
Artwork (c) Selunca (Me)
Set created by Selunca (Me)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:57 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
User avatar

Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 9:16 pm
Stijn wrote:
Doesn't Neopets say that anything you submit to their site becomes theirs? By submitting, you agree. So Neo gets the copyright.


The United States Copyright Office does not accept that as a valid transfer of copyright, from what I've read. Neopets could say it, but it doesn't make it true. Regardless, Neopets doesn't ask for exclusive rights. Besides, owning a work or a copy of it does not equal having copyright. Only the author gets that, unless the transfer of copyright is submitted in writing.

"Mere ownership of a book, manuscript, painting, or any other copy or phonorecord does not give the possessor the copyright. The law provides that transfer of ownership of any material object that embodies a protected work does not of itself convey any rights in the copyright."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:06 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Posts: 3739
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Idiotville
Actually, the USCO has very little to do with it; you are assumed to read the rules and understand them when you sign up. And when you sign up, all of the information that you submit is considered to be valid, and therefore entering your name and agreeing to the terms and conditions constitutes an electronic signature on a contract (end user license agreement, really).

So since you've signed a contract saying they get your stuff - they get your stuff. Now, you still own the copyright, but they own the image. So you can't post it or sell it without their permission.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:39 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
User avatar

Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 9:16 pm
shapu wrote:
Actually, the USCO has very little to do with it; you are assumed to read the rules and understand them when you sign up. And when you sign up, all of the information that you submit is considered to be valid, and therefore entering your name and agreeing to the terms and conditions constitutes an electronic signature on a contract (end user license agreement, really).

So since you've signed a contract saying they get your stuff - they get your stuff. Now, you still own the copyright, but they own the image. So you can't post it or sell it without their permission.


The electronic signature may indeed be valid, I couldn't find enough info on that. And I would say they own a copy of the image. Much like a limited edition print of an original. That wouldn't give them the right to dictate to you whether or not you could copy (post) or sell your original. That is part of exclusive copyright:

"To reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords

To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:42 pm 
Way Beyond Godly
Way Beyond Godly

Posts: 8715
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Gender: Female
*in stonewolf3x tone* Bite them on the leg and report them for harassment. 5 NP please. I'd say stick your insignia in a spot when if it gets erased, it will make the picture look cruddy.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 1:31 am 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 3602
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:23 am
Location: Set by Stampsyne. Thanks!
Vertigo wrote:
Stijn wrote:
Doesn't Neopets say that anything you submit to their site becomes theirs? By submitting, you agree. So Neo gets the copyright.


The United States Copyright Office does not accept that as a valid transfer of copyright, from what I've read. Neopets could say it, but it doesn't make it true. Regardless, Neopets doesn't ask for exclusive rights. Besides, owning a work or a copy of it does not equal having copyright. Only the author gets that, unless the transfer of copyright is submitted in writing.

"Mere ownership of a book, manuscript, painting, or any other copy or phonorecord does not give the possessor the copyright. The law provides that transfer of ownership of any material object that embodies a protected work does not of itself convey any rights in the copyright."


But since you submitted it, they can of course do what they like with it right? Of course provided they give you credit (which they do anyway). It's just like you giving someone a hundred dollars. Since you gave it to him, he can use it anyhow he likes. You can't say "Hey I did not sign a contract transferring the money to you! You can't use it!"


<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v379/qanda/qandalitsiggy.gif" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com">


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 1:44 am 
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 9:18 pm
Art theft is about as flattering as the person urinating their ignorance on your shoe. By stealing your art, they may be showing that they respect the picture, but they sure as heck don't respect you. I consider my artwork to be like any of my other possessions. If you steal it so you can say it's yours/pawn it off, I'll come after you and they'll never find the body. :x (It's happened to me before and I get furious.)

Always respect other people's hard work.



Back on topic: I agree with everyone who says that those people are jealous. You should be proud that you got in to the Art Gallery!


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 3:16 am 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
User avatar

Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 9:16 pm
Qanda wrote:
But since you submitted it, they can of course do what they like with it right? Of course provided they give you credit (which they do anyway). It's just like you giving someone a hundred dollars. Since you gave it to him, he can use it anyhow he likes. You can't say "Hey I did not sign a contract transferring the money to you! You can't use it!"


I think there are some limits? But I'm not really sure, it seems to get a bit tangled past that point. And even if there are limits, it's probably near impossible to do anything about it. Better off not submitting.

The use of the image by other players on the Neopets site may or may not violate copyright, definitely does if they claim it as their own I would think.

The main reason I don't want people to automatically assume that a contract is the final say is because it often costs people money when it shouldn't. I signed a lease with a pet fee that's illegal in my state. That clause was invalid, I didn't have to pay it. I did reimburse for damages my cats did after, I was responsible for that and didn't mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 90 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group