Pink Poogle Toy Forum

The official community of Pink Poogle Toy
Main Site
NeoDex
It is currently Thu Apr 09, 2026 5:27 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 6:51 am 
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
User avatar

Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 6:34 am
genie_mcbeal wrote:

I agree with yptee, the sinking is need not be taken into consideration. And I got a similar range of answer to him.

Hint:
If there are 4 rows, total number of marbles should be 1 + (1+2) + (1+2+3) + (1+2+3+4).

Objective is to find the number of rows, but u gotta use number of marbles to help u.

Eg, if there are only 10 kikos, there are 20 marbles, that means they can only stack up to 4 rows, meaning it would be 4 x 2 = 8 cm high

I tried to solve it by using a double summation at first, summation of the first n terms followed by the summation of that result from 1 to m. In other words, a summation (from 1 to m) of the summation of the first n terms. This answer must be less than or equal to the number of (kikos x 2). From there, solve the cubic equation and find the nearest integer m that satisfies the inequality.

Haha... Anyone even understand what I'm saying? Graduated with a degree in maths, but honest, u don't really need university knowledge of maths to do this. High School is enough.

On a last note, I tried using summation as mentioned earlier, but I couldn't solve the cubic equation because the number was too big. Neither did I use any maths algebraic software to help me with it. I simply took the advice of one of the hints earlier to help me out.


I got the overall summation as ½∑(n+n²), where n= numbers of layers. Hope this helps.... Ans is between 300 and 500.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 8:18 am 
PPT Student
PPT Student
User avatar

Posts: 272
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:29 am
Location: Antarctica or space...you get the idea already.
So I figure they use the "(out of 1,050,000)" number instead of the actual one because what if someone made another one? Wouldn't that completely throw everyone off?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 10:00 am 
Newbie
Newbie

Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 3:39 am
Quote:
I got the overall summation as ½∑(n+n²), where n= numbers of layers. Hope this helps.... Ans is between 300 and 500.


yeah, I got the same thing - then I wrote a small c-program to find out what number n actually is... I hope it's right. if my solution is right, it doesn't matter if you take the max number of kikos or the actual number of kikos; the max number of layers is the same.

*hopes her answer is right*


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 11:35 am 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 2775
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 11:45 am
Location: muhaha
If there are marbles left over, should i just leave them out or add them to the problem somehow?


Image
Losers are those who do not try


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 11:52 am 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler

Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 6:07 am
Location: Ireland
weirdguy wrote:
So I figure they use the "(out of 1,050,000)" number instead of the actual one because what if someone made another one? Wouldn't that completely throw everyone off?


Actually it doesn't matter you use the actual or 1.05m, the answer is still the same.

In my calculation, I ignore any left over as it cannot be used to increase the height of the pyramid any further. I hope that helps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 12:25 pm 
Newbie
Newbie

Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:36 am
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Finally!

The numbers 1, 3, 6, 10,....have the nth term given by n(n+1)/2

So the sum of n terms of the series is

n n
SUM[r(r+1)/2] = (1/2).SUM[r^2 + r]
r=1 r=1


= (1/2)[n(n+1)(2n+1)/6 + n(n+1)/2]

n(n+1)
= ------[2n+1 + 3]
12

= n(n+1)(2n+4)/12

= n(n+1)(n+2)/6

Check: If n=4 this gives 4 x 5 x 6/6 = 20 which is correct.

So we nust solve the equation

n(n+1)(n+2)/6 = 2,100,000

n(n+1)(n+2) = 12,600,000

The height of the pyramid is (Will be given to those who wish to be spoiled neomail artemisanoush)


:( but my siggy and avatar were brandon boyd!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 1:06 pm 
Newbie
Newbie

Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 11:07 pm
The only problem is: this cubic equation is too difficult to solve without using computational means. So it will take either a maths software, a graphing software, write a program or use excel. In any case, I think puzzle is kinda difficult, it's purely mathematical and not many people can solve it unless they understand the concept of summation i think.

Well, but I like this kinda puzzles, at least there's logic and computable. Unlike the previous ones which did not have much mathematical logic involved, just a matter of pattern observation


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 4:41 pm 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 2743
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: PEI, Canada
Gender: Female
You have to use every marble; the puzzle says so. "Every kiko in Neopia uses its marbles." And it asks "how many cm tall can the pyramid get?" (instead of "how many cms tall is the finished pyramid?"), which suggests it's not completed to a point, but still a work in progress when they run out of marbles. You just need to know how many cms they can manage with what they have.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 5:34 am 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 4593
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Oregon Outback
Brain.. h .. u .. r .. t .. s :roflol:


Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 5:52 am 
PPT God
PPT God
User avatar

Posts: 1838
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 11:00 pm
Location: Since it's not a rule to put real info in here to help people, I live in Lala land
Well, depending on if they wanted us to assume that all the Kikos were only the ones they created for us, then the number is 2cm less than the actual number of Kikos. Using the fact that they used all of their marbles, and assuming they tried to build the biggest pyramid they could, then the height was around 400cm, but unless you do the work for yourself, then that number is useless to you :P


Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:48 pm 
Newbie
Newbie

Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:36 am
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Congratulations! You have guessed correctly in the Lenny Conundrum game (Round 86). We have given you 1887 NP!

Woohoo! That's right baby. :)


:( but my siggy and avatar were brandon boyd!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 3:03 am 
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
User avatar

Posts: 524
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 4:02 am
Location: somewhere downunder
Congratulations! You have guessed correctly in the Lenny Conundrum game (Round 86). We have given you a Orange Chocolate Kiko, an Avatar, and 1887 NP! AND Third place Trophy at Lenny Conundrum!!

I answered 462 cm (231 layers x 2cm)

this site helped: http://milan.milanovic.org/math/Math.php?akcija=SviTetra

note: In this list the actual "layer" was 233 for the total number of kikos x 2 marbles
but as can be seen in this list the first two "layers" contain no total value so the "right" layer is 231.
Also it did not matter whether the kikos were calculated as 1050000 or 1050311 as both satisfy this answer.


Image
Make Your Choice in Reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 3:28 am 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 2743
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: PEI, Canada
Gender: Female
I won, too. I thought we'd get more than 1887 NP! I found this one much harder than the last one, but fewer people solved that one. Someone must have leaked this one's answer on the neoboards or something.

Also, looks like the kikos DID have to build the pyramid to a point and had marbles left over. I thought for sure I'd get it wrong and that 392 cm would be the answer; that's what it would have been if you had to use every marble (although the pyramid would not be complete; they'd get to 196 rows before running out of marbles).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 2:16 am 
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
User avatar

Posts: 524
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 4:02 am
Location: somewhere downunder
They completed 231 layers with 2081156 marbles and would not have sufficient marbles to complete the 232nd layer which would take 2108184 marbles (~ 8000 marbles short)


Image
Make Your Choice in Reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 185 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group