162 wrote:
*Seethes*
I mean, if their art was OUTSTANDING, it might be excusable... but NOT that. Seriously. People like me spend a lot of their time making ORIGINAL comics that NEVER get in, and yet obvious plagarism is excused?!
Whether their art is exceptional or not shouldn't have anything to do with it. Plagerism is plagerism. People whose art is amazing, and who do amazing things (such as copys of masters paintings) and then don't credit said masters are still thieves.
On top of this, insulting them isn't... *sighs* it's not exactly fair to insult their artwork. They're most likely young, and their art is probably where it should be for their ages.
I know it's hard to make original comics, and probably TNT thinks that those that are funny should get in. People will always slip through the cracks in such manners. Just because somethings the best, or somethings hillarious doesn't mean that it should get in. Neopets isn't dominated by professional cartoonists. It's dominated by preteens and teens. Therefore the quality of the work is going to be like that for the most part.
It's why I don't get into the gallery all the time. Might as well give someone else a chance, ya know? *winks*

Evisceration is a sign of respect.