bgryph wrote:
Indeed. Given that most of the female Royal pets are your stereotypical Barbiesque princesses, pink and fluffy, I shudder to think what they'd come up with to differentiate between male and female pets in other colors.
My female Eyrie and Darigan Peophin don't need giant pink bows, thank you very much.
no no no, they wouldn't have to do something like that. Your Thinking a bit over the top.
Girl pets would probably be "fluffier" for lack of better words, i.e., female wockys would probably have a few extra tufts of fur like around the paws and stuff, plus, the pose would be more feminine. Male wockys would have a larger main, and more manlly pose. Kinda get what I’m saying? Just a few things so you can differentiate.
They probably shouldn’t touch the darigan pets though, that I do agree with, darigan pets aren’t meant to look female at all really. Well, some are, but they can still look male. (the darigan ashia looks female, but it could be male to)
Personally, If they do do it, the new kougra should be the boy version, it LOOKS male, I mean, come on, it’s got a beard thingy! >_<
Some pets WOULD be a bit of a challenge, like the grarrl, but to be a female pet, it doesn’t really have to LOOK female per say, but simply be easy to tell from the male. So give on of the two some sort of frilly head dinosaur thing…and change the poses a little, there ya go.
Some pets really NEED to be done, like the Usul, simply because it’s one of those non-neutral pets. >_<